Scroll Top

Movie Review: Prometheus


So, here it is. Prometheus is finally upon us. I suppose reviews like this will be swallowed up by the wave of critical and popular adulation that will be heaped upon the film. I’ll start like this: Prometheus was good. In fact, I rated Prometheus at 7/10 on IMD. My earliest memories of Prometheus are that it would serve as some sort of loosely-connected prologue to Alien, but with Scott’s intention being on telling a story that explores the origins of humanity. In many respects, Scott has done just that; unfortunately,Prometheus suffers greatly due to its own identity crisis. It wants to be a film that explores the question of “Why are we here,” but, at the same time, it also wants to be a movie about nasty space monsters. This ulterior motive is what truly brought the film down.


On the way out of the theater, I was overwhelmed by two feelings: disappointment and confusion. Prometheus is so many different movies rolled into one package. Storylines are jammed together with no delicacy, and cliched plot devices are littered all over the place. A younger director would have been able to make the decision about what he wanted his movie to be (exploration of the purpose of life or an alien horror movie). An ambitious young director would have probably taken up the challenge and succeeded where Scott failed. In the final years of his career, Scott couldn’t quite put the two ideas together that well. As such, the movie is poorly paced and woefully convoluted. Fortunately, Scott’s all-start cast and stunning visual effects save this movie from being unwatchable.

Michael Fassbender easily stole the show. His performance was incredibly nuanced and absolutely captivating. I’ve been going out of my way to see Michael Fassbender in whatever I can find since Inglorious Basterds. His turn as Archie Hicox was insanely memorable. The method behind his acting must be exhausting. Fassbender puts his all into every character he plays, and David is no different. His movements are surreal, and his mannerisms reflect his android nature so well. Truly, Fassbender’s David joins the ranks of all-time greatest android performances. prometheusNoomi Rapace turns in a respectable performance as Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, the protagonist. She is an incredibly dynamic actress and she serves well as a vehicle for the audience. She also had some nice on-screen chemistry with Logan Marshall Green, who also turned in a good performance as Charlie Holloway. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba also turn in great supporting performances. Elba supplies some of the movie’s best lines, and Theron’s cold performance keeps you at a distance from the character, which is by no means a negative remark. She knew what she wanted to do with Meredith Vickers, and she certainly nailed the performance.

Scott’s visual effects team deliver just as much as the actors. There are some breathtaking visuals in this movie. Computer displays and characters’ HUDs are vibrant and refreshing. The film’s big moments are absolutely overwhelming. Shots of the Prometheus flying by are exciting and spectacularly detailed. The VFX team did great work on this film, and I imagine they’ve given other studios and teams a new standard to aim for.

Overall, despite a very confused story, Prometheus is worth a watch. It’s one of the best sci-fi blockbusters we’ve gotten in awhile. At 2 hours and 4 minutes, it’s long enough, but, unfortunately, poor pacing really make the first hour or so drag a bit. You’ll be captivated by the actors and the visual effects, which is nice since the story leaves much to be desired.

What did you think? Was Prometheus the confused visual and dramatic dazzler I’ve made it out to be or has Ridley Scott delivered on a science fiction masterpiece? Sound off in the comments.


Related Posts

Comments (6)

You certainly hit the point spot on. I was woefully disappointed and your comment suggesting the film was trying to be all things to all men just about sums it up for me. The shortcomings of the story and a less than engaging script pained me.

I would love to see Jon Spaihts' original before DL got his hands on it.

Overall I thoroughly enjoyed it. Perhaps it's been so long since I've seen a halfway decent 'proper sci-fi' film that I'm prepared to overlook the pacing problem.

I have a feeling the the film suffered from being cut to fit international ratings systems. Here in the UK it was a '15' and I thought it looked like some of the most horrific ideas in Scott's head were glossed over a little.

Perhaps a revised director's cut edition could improve upon its weaknesses…

I would say I agree with the Disappointment and Confusion, but not necessarily in that order. I like that you have to keep asking questions after the movie, Ridley Scott clearly had that intention. I could see it coming after seeing him host Prophets of Science Fiction.


Yes! A thousand times yes! I actually had no idea that Lindelof had been allowed near the screenplay, so, when I saw his name in the opening credits, I groaned audibly.

James Victor Von Hal

Man, I loved this film. I'd give it a solid 8/10, with the two points being knocked off because of some inconsistency at the end. I thought the plot was well done, and the questions it leaves open has left me talking about it for almost a week.

This is really an amazing movie. If you are in to thrillers and fantasies, this one servers right. But I don’t think that everyone will find this movie interesting. But those of you who do won’t forget it that easily. click here for more info

Comments are closed.